Application of a Monitored Lifestyle Modification Program Prevent the Progression from Prediabetes to Diabetes among Patients with Chronic Psychiatric Disorders over six-month period.

P: population- Patients over 40, with chronic psychiatric disorder, diagnosed with prediabetes

I: intervention-Application of a monitored lifestyle modification program

C: -comparison- No program

O: outcome- No Progression to DM

T: time- Over a 6-month period

Review of the Literature
The written paper will address the following criteria on your chosen topic. The Grading Rubric for Graduate Written Assignments will be used for grading. An introduction and conclusion are required. Do not provide an abstract. The paper should not exceed 10 double spaced pages (excluding the title page, references and appendix of the Literature Review Matrix). This paper is NOT a short summary of the lit matrix but a detailed literature review of each article that is listed in the lit matrix.APA 6th ed. format is required. Please include the lit matrix.
Criteria Details
Introduction The introduction to this paper should be a minimum of a paragraph and include:
Discussion of the general topic, issue, or area of research, providing an appropriate explanation for reviewing the literature.
Point out what has been published about the topic, and conflicts or gaps in the research.
State the general findings of the review in a summarization (what do most of the sources conclude)?
Provide a comment on the availability of sources in the subject area.
Explain the criteria to be used in analyzing and comparing the literature.
Literature Review
(See Chapter 6 in Grove, Burns & Gray). Explain the methodology used to locate the best evidence.
Identify the databases used for the search.
Include the search terms used-key words for the search.
What inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to the search?
Identify the number of studies and ranges of dates of the studies/evidence retrieved, along with the number and publication dates of the studies.
Limit articles to last 5 years unless landmark or classic study/theory.
Identify and define the hierarchy/ strength of evidence (Gray, Grove, & Sutherland, 2017).
Critically appraise the studies chosen for your literature review. This is conducted using the process outlined on the Literature Review Matrix and the rapid critical appraisals of qualitative and quantitative research, Gray, et al., 2017). Any statistics that are available in the research article should be included in the review.
Synthesize and discuss, in detail, the major recommendations that emerge from the synthesis of evidence.
Limitations of the search and review.
Conclusion Summarization of key finding of the review.
Note commonalities between works, favorable or not.
This is the researchers opportunity to justify the research proposal. Restate your proposal and support according to the finding of the review.

Do you have a similar assignment/prompt? Let one of our professional writers take care of it. Place an order at Essaypanthers; pay only 50% of the order and send balance upon receiving your completed paper

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s