999 NATO Bombing of Serbia/Kosovo – “Why is the NATO bombing of former Yugoslavia in 1999 considered “humanitarian” intervention and why was (the U.S. given asymmetrical power during the NATO?) it a violation of international state sovereignty?” 1999 NATO Bombing of Serbia/Kosovo – “Why is the NATO bombing of former Yugoslavia in 1999 considered “humanitarian” intervention and why was (the U.S. given asymmetrical power during the NATO?) it a violation of international state sovereignty?”

Dear Writer, the purpose of the Literature Review is to develop an argument for the method chosen to use in the research, and why this method is suitable for addressing the research question. The literature review is also meant to give the reader a summary of the current knowledge on your topic: how can you group the various authors under consideration? What assumptions do they share? Do they agree about the implications of their work? Do they prioritise things the same and/or correctly? what gaps are there in those views?

The literature review must have some kind of structure. For example, it can begin by describing a phenomenon in a general way along with several studies that demonstrate it, then describing two or more competing theories of the phenomenon, and finally presenting a hypothesis to test one or more of the theories, based on the research question.

Remember that the goal is to construct an argument for why the research question is interesting and worth addressing—not necessarily why a favorite answer to it is correct. By the end of the literature review, readers should be convinced that the research question makes sense and that the present study is a logical next step in the ongoing research process.

You should demonstrate awareness of key research in the relevant fields and provide an analytical summary of current knowledge.

MUST inform the reader of previous research on the topic. Where does the research fit in the broader knowledge of the area? How is the research similar to or different from other research in the field? What is original in the research? Or if is proposed to replicate previous research, then why is such replication necessary and to what end? Use the literature review to offer a narrowly focused critique on the previous research that has direct relevance to the proposed study.

What has each source contributed to the reader’s understanding of the topic and how it has advanced the knowledge on the topic. There is NO limit on sources! Must use as many as possible out there. In fact, who are the key people that kicked off this field??? Ask questions that the Literature Review cannot answer. What HASN’T been answered yet??? What has not been answered about the intervention?

When referencing, follow this structure: (John, 2012: 5; Megan, 2000: 56; Lee, 2006: 110). Please use page numbers, as seen. This Literature Review will not have one source per sentence, rather, 2-5 sources per relevant reference. This must not sound like an essay where you find only one source per line. IT IS IMPORTANT TO represent BOTH sides of the story. E.G. – NON-INTERVENTIONIST and FOR THE INTERVENTION. So, finding sources that say the bombing was necessary, and others that say it was not humanitarian as intended – 50/50 balance between each perspective on the topic. Sources have been attached.

Watch out for judgemental/biased language. Do not take sides. This literature review must be neutral and must not favor a position on the topic. Thus, no opinion and equal debate from both sides. This is not the place for arguing a case. It should more sound like E.G. “One school of thought within this scholarship is A, one is B, another bunch of scholars have tried to synthesise it and come up C, and no one has looked at D.” Please do not argue an opinion. I hope that makes sense. Attached is sample literature reviews and many sources. Thank you!!!

Do you have a similar assignment/prompt? Let one of our professional writers take care of it. Place an order at Essaypanthers; pay only 50% of the order and send balance upon receiving your completed paper


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s